top of page

12. Watching Zoe & Lindsey

[From our earliest moments on planet earth] there’s one question that all brains want answered, and they want it answered, “Yes.” And they don’t want a lukewarm “Yes,” or a “Maybe Yes,” or a “Getting-to-Yes, Yes.” They want a substantial, resounding, unequivocal, “YES! Yes.” When the answer is something other than “Yes,” if the answer is “Maybe,” or “I’m not sure,” a confusion and uncertainty begins to take shape in our brains. The question our brains ask is: Are you there for me? Do I matter enough

that you’ll put me first when I need you to? Can I count on you to attend to me in the ways I need you to? Do I truly and deeply matter to you?

— Mark Brady, Ph.D.

​

Being-With Zoe

 

In the mid-1990’s, my colleagues Bert Powell, Glen Cooper, Jude Cassidy and I were invited to study with Beatrice Beebe from Columbia University, the world’s leading authority on reading moment to moment interaction between parents and infants.

 

Dr. Beebe’s video microanalysis is a pioneering psychological research methodology that uses high-speed, split-screen video to analyze parent–infant interactions frame by frame (at 30 to 60 frames per second), acting as a “relational microscope" to decode split-second nonverbal behavior of infants at four months of age and predict with astounding accuracy the level of security, insecurity, or disorganization (scientifically evaluated) at one year of age.

 

Because emotional signaling happens in split-second windows (often 200 to 300 milliseconds), the naked eye often misses critical nuances in real-time. By breaking recorded interactions down second by second and frame by frame, Beatrice was able to teach us how to recognize and make sense of rapid emotional rhythms, micro-expressions, and emotional shifts in both the parent and child that literally govern a child’s sense of security or insecurity. 

 

Infants are always asking: “Are you witn me in this moment, in this emotion” and “Will you let me be me, without interfering and trying to reprogram me.”

 

Over three years in our study with Beatrice we learned how babies actively regulate their own arousal. As you will soon see with Zoe, when an infant experiences escalating physiological arousal, their heart rate rises, prompting them to look away to self-soothe. Secure caregivers and infants, for example, tolerate this natural withdrawal and smoothly reconnect. Insecure dyads frequently exhibit either a "chase and dodge" dynamic, where the parent leans in aggressively when the baby seeks space. Or the parent, experiencing a brief moment of distance might pull back or look away. Upon reflection, such a parent will often express feeling rejected or left behind. Sometimes a parent will admit to feeling a need to punish the child by ceasing to be available, the the hope of making the infant need more fully. 

 

Insecure dyads with babies as young as two months old show infants already experiencing a sense of intrusion with the infant learning how sensitive the parent is to even a moment’s autonomy and personal need. As will soon be seen with another baby, Lindsey, we are looking at the precursors to how a child learns they must attune to the parent rather than trust in the parent’s ability to attune to them. Such a child is learning to not count on her own feeling state as anything to trust or believe valuable. 

 

Self worth is born or lost precisely here.

 

What you are about to see is a brief video from a PBS documentary showing the secure “attunement dance” between a mother and her two month of daughter, Zoe. In my years of study with Beatrice and subsequent years of video analysis of many parents and infants, I have only seen two additional dyads capable of this level of secure synchrony and relational attunement. This mother has the capacity to share authentic delight (rather than being over-bright) while offering support for her daughter’s bids for connection and her need for moments away.  Such availability and sponsorship for both closeness and disengagement is all too rare. Being mistuned via parental intrusion (“too much”) and/or withdrawal(“not enough”) are far more common. 

​

Image 9-13-26 at 2.20 PM.png
eightysevenminutes

 

Of particular interest is a very brief interchange is how the mother followed her daughter’s cues. Near the end of this clip where Zoe shows what Beatrice Beebe describes as a “woe face.” Parents will often see this expression of sadness and quickly attempt to “up-regulate” the infant. Many of us instruct a child to “be happy” or say “don’t be sad.” Unable to experience even brief “moments of woe” is recognized as being partly responsible for how very young children begin to make decisions concerning which emotions are acceptable and which are unacceptable. This can become the beginning of how we disregard and bury so called “negative” emotions. Zoe’s mother actually joins Zoe with a woe face of her own, sponsoring Zoe in not feeling alone in her sadness. 

 

The impact of the  “unthought known” (experiences of self and other learned prior to our having language) on our beliefs about ourselves and others through the remainder of our lives cannot be overstated.  

 

[Click Image to Watch]

Gemini_Generated_Image_5p4c5m5p4c5m5p4c.jpg
eightysevenminutes

​

Watching Lindsey (early insecurity)

​

Through my study with Beatrice Beebe, I learned to pay exquisite attention to how infants pay exquisite attention to the quality of the AND between their caregivers and themselves. In the following observation of video freeze-frame you will witness baby Lindsey as she experiences AND as a series of questions: "Are you here with me now? And now? And now? Will you stay with me as I change moment to moment? Can you say YES to all of me or are there places in me where you start saying Maybe yes. Or No. Or almost, but not really?"

​

Attachment researchers spend a great deal of time watching babies with their caregivers in millisecond interactions. We notice how infants are always paying very close attention to the willingness of their caregiver to follow their lead.

 

So, as an attachment researcher it is my job to pay exquisite attention to how infants pay exquisite attention to the quality of AND between their caregivers and themselves. In the following observation of video freeze-frame you will witness baby Lindsey experience AND as a question: "Are you here with me now? And now? And now? Will you stay with me as I change moment to moment? Can you say YES to all of me or are there places in me where you start saying Maybe yes. Or No Way?"

​

Image 9-13-26 at 3.28 PM.png
eightysevenminutes

​

I’m sitting next to a mother as she perches on her chair’s edge, looking toward a video monitor placed in front of us. Monica is a highly successful young professional seeking help because her four-month-old daughter Lindsey, “just cries and cries, unable to calm herself down.” After a brief pause she adds, “Maybe I spoil her, because she seems so ungrateful.” I’m about to show a recently recorded videotape of this mother and daughter in a standard laboratory interactive session. The screen displays Monica as she sits on a folding chair directly facing Lindsey, who is leaning back in a car seat looking in the direction of her mom.

​

As Monica and I watch the monitor, we see how she is smiling broadly, eyes dilated, intensely focusing upon her daughter. This mother, utilizing her signature upbeat intonation, calls out to Lindsey in a high-pitched voice. “Hey Linds! Watcha doin’n?” Her daughter, head at the back of her chair, returns her mother’s smile for several seconds and then looks out beyond her mom, then down and to the right. Monica immediately shifts her weight, bringing her head into alignment with her daughter’s new position. With a cheerful, bubbly voice mom chants “Lindsey, Lindsey! Hey, Linds!” Her daughter’s shoulders shrug briefly as she momentarily meets her mother’s gaze. They both grin, each smiling, but this time Lindsey’s smile seems slightly odd, almost forced. The baby’s eyes quickly move up past her mother to the lights on the ceiling. The mother’s smile falters for a few tenths of a second, then seems to ratchet up a notch. Monica raises her right hand and commences to gently, but insistently poke her child’s tummy. “You like to be tickled don’t you? Yes, you do. Gotcha, gotcha, gotcha.” As she finishes the third repetition of “gotcha,” Lindsey winces briefly, then begins to whimper. Not yet crying, it is clear that she soon will. Mother momentarily shifts her gaze out and away from Lindsey, frowns slightly, and with a barely discernible irritation turns to face her daughter. This mother’s tone is suddenly flat, the cheer fully vanished. “I think you’re just sleepy. You just get so cranky when you need a nap.” Now turning away, she begins rummaging through her purse. With a voice slightly aloof, almost curt, she intones: “Let me find your Binky.”

​

From a clinical perspective, what we’ve just seen is a mother whose hope for shared happiness makes it hard to read her daughter’s bids for personal space and a slower, less frantic rhythm. Because of this mother’s inability to dial-down her own need, her child eventually winces and whimpers, cuing ever more directly that mom’s intense agenda is simply too much. Unfortunately, when Monica notices her daughter’s distance, she misses an opportunity to experience the relationship from her child’s perspective. Instead, because she is feeling momentarily rejected this mother withdraws her warmth. She’ll back off, but with a sense of confusion and growing resentment. Sadly, they are moving into a relationship where neither mother nor daughter will feel they can get things right.

​

Moments of not meeting. Moments of void.

 

To paraphrase Winnicott: It is easier to remember difficult, even traumatic events, than it is to remember moments of absence, where presence was needed. How do you remember nothing happening when an attuned response was needed? How do you remember the specifics of emptiness?

​

What we’ve seen here certainly wouldn’t be defined as neglect or abandonment, at least not in the way we might typically understand these terms. Even so, four-month-old Lindsey has begun to experience something of what it’s like to feel unknown. Naturally, instinctively seeking an experience of AND from a mother who is well-intentioned but unable to read some of her cues, Lindsey already has a dawning sense of being a stranger in a strange land.

​

How is Lindsey to make sense of the fact that the central figure in her life, the one teaching her the structure and nuance of relationship, is unable to read her requests for less pressure and more personal space? How, at four months old, is she to understand the sense of absence she is already beginning to know?

​

Years later, unable to decipher persistent feelings of isolation and a tendency for self-attack, Lindsey might find herself speaking to a therapist. “It makes absolutely no sense. I had an almost perfect childhood. My mom was utterly devoted to me. But, inside I feel lost, like no one actually ‘Gets it. Gets me.’ I’m never really happy, or even satisfied. There’s something really wrong with me. I’m such an ungrateful bitch.”

​

There she’ll still be sitting, feeling terrible and bad. There she'll sit blaming herself for an emptiness that makes no sense.

​

She will sit in absence, yet she won't feel completely alone. Lindsey will have something bad about herself and her life to focus on, and she'll have a persistent, harsh, yet ever-present Voice keeping her company. Unfortunately, I see this in therapy patients like a grown-up Lindsey all the time.

​

It is important to know that research is now making clear that when a parent recognizes the rupture to the relationship in inevitable moments of misattunment and chooses to repair the miscue on her/his part, the bond actually deepens. Mistakes in our connection (moments of disinterest, being overly happy, trying to push the child out of hurt or anger or joy, being invasive, etc.) aren't the problem. Not noticing these ruptures and consistently miscuing the child in the same emotional events without acknowledging them and finding another way is where deeper problems begin.

 

Rupture is inevitable. We simply can't be attuned all the time. Thinking we have to be becomes an even bigger problem. Repair (recognizing ruptures and returning to AND, whenever possible) is key.

 

Good enough is good enough.

 

< Prev   |   Next >

​

bottom of page